YOUTUBE RESOURCES -

1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0Ta65OqQkY
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaRkONvyGr8
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5faMjKuB9bc&t=1s

Introduction: In the dynamic landscape of distributed systems, ensuring seamless scalability and performance is paramount. Traditional hashing methods may fall short when it comes to load balancing in environments where server additions or removals are frequent. This blog delves into two powerful techniques—consistent hashing and sharding—that play pivotal roles in achieving efficient load distribution and scalability in distributed systems.

Consistent Hashing: Preserving Harmony in Load Balancing

The Problem: Traditional hashing techniques often face challenges when it comes to accommodating changes in server configurations. Adding or removing servers may lead to significant remapping of requests, causing cache invalidation and increased processing overhead.

The Solution: Consistent hashing introduces a novel concept—a virtual "hash ring." This ring assigns positions to both servers and data objects, ensuring that requests are mapped to the nearest server on the ring. This minimizes disruptions during server changes, preserving cache efficiency.

Benefits:

• Minimal Request Remapping: Only a small fraction of requests are affected when servers are added or removed, preventing widespread cache invalidation.

• Scalability: The system can effortlessly scale by adding more servers to the ring without requiring major reconfiguration.

• Data Distribution: Consistent hashing enables even distribution of data across servers, optimizing access efficiency.

Implementation:

• Hash Ring: Visualize a circular ring where points represent positions for servers and data objects.

• Server Mapping: Each server's ID is hashed to a point on the ring.

• Request Mapping: Request IDs are hashed, and the request is directed to the nearest server clockwise on the ring.

• Adding/Removing Servers: The process involves hashing the new server's ID and adjusting the ring accordingly. Requests near the new server's point get mapped to it.

Virtual Servers: To further mitigate the impact of load imbalances, multiple hash functions can be employed, creating virtual points for each server on the ring. This distributes the effects of adding or removing servers more evenly.

Applications: Consistent hashing finds widespread application in distributed systems, notably in load balancing scenarios such as web caches and databases.

Key Takeaways:

• Consistent hashing provides a scalable and efficient approach to load balancing in dynamic environments.

• The use of a virtual hash ring and virtual servers minimizes request remapping, ensuring smooth operation during server changes.

Sharding: Partitioning Data for Unprecedented Scalability

Key Concepts:

• Horizontal Partitioning: Data is divided based on a specific attribute, such as user ID, and each partition is assigned to a separate server.

• Sharding: A specific type of horizontal partitioning where each server holds a distinct range of data based on the chosen attribute.

• Consistency and Availability: Ensuring data integrity while maintaining accessibility for user requests.

• Joins: Combining data from multiple partitions, which can be costly across shards.

• Flexibility: The ability to add or remove servers easily.

Consistent Hashing in Sharding: Consistent hashing dynamically distributes data across servers while maintaining flexibility in sharding.

Hierarchical Sharding: Large partitions can be further divided into smaller sub-partitions for granular control.

Master-Slave Architecture: Utilizing a primary server for writes and secondary servers for reads ensures redundancy and failover capabilities.

Benefits of Sharding:

• Improved Performance: Distributes load across servers, enhancing both read and write performance.

• Scalability: Allows the addition of more servers as data grows.

Challenges of Sharding:

• Complexity: Implementation and maintenance require careful consideration of consistency and data access patterns.

• Joins Across Shards: Expensive operations that can slow down queries.

• Less Flexibility: Fixed partition sizes make sharded databases less flexible than their non-sharded counterparts.

Alternatives to Sharding:

• Database Optimization: Techniques like indexing to improve query performance.

• NoSQL Databases: Specifically designed for horizontal partitioning.

Recommendations:

• Consider sharding only when other solutions like optimization or NoSQL databases prove insufficient.

• Start with simpler solutions before venturing into the complexities of sharding.

Additional Notes:

• Sharding attributes can vary based on application requirements, not limited to user ID.

• Indexing on shards can further enhance query performance.

• Master-slave architecture aids in failover scenarios if a shard server fails.

Conclusion: In the realm of distributed systems, consistent hashing and sharding emerge as powerful tools, addressing the challenges posed by dynamic environments. By adopting these techniques, organizations can achieve optimal load balancing, scalability, and performance, ensuring the seamless operation of their distributed systems in the face of constant change.

• *